The Online Onslaught Forums
By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows.
Thanks!
Member List
|
Search
|
FAQ
|
Live Chat
Back to: OOWrestling.com
Last active: Never Not logged in [
Login
-
Register
]
OO Forums
»
Wrestling: Look at all These Lumberjacks!
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (February 1, 2010)
» Edit Post
Edit Post
Username
Need to register?
Password:
Forgot password?
Subject:
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
White
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Message:
HTML is On
Smilies areOn
BB Code
is On
[img] Code is On
Not a bad show. Still, a bit disappointed they aren't working the Dynasty into the Bret/Vince story. But Batista sort of works, and it at least gets the Batista/Cena feud into something entertaining and meaningful. Anyone else think it's weird doing Chamber-qualification matches the day after the Rumble? You either last 20+ gruelling minutes in the rumble to get a title shot.... or you wait a day later, win one match against Mark Henry, and you get a title match. For me it dampens the importance of the Rumble. I'm looking forward to who they end up dumping in the MitB match at WM. Big Show would be a unique in a freaky kinda way, and a strong showing from Swagger in that kinda match would do wonders for his image.
Disable smileys?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
OO Forums
»
Wrestling: Look at all These Lumberjacks!
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (February 1, 2010)
» Edit Post
Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group � 2002
Processed in 0.1445730 seconds, 21 queries