The Online Onslaught Forums
By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows.
Thanks!
Member List
|
Search
|
FAQ
|
Live Chat
Back to: OOWrestling.com
Last active: Never Not logged in [
Login
-
Register
]
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
2.24.11 HUGE Announcement Showdown: Jericho vs. Mistico
» Post Reply
Post Reply
Who Can Post?
All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username
Need to register?
Password:
Forgot password?
Subject:
(optional)
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
White
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Message:
HTML is On
Smilies are On
BB Code
is On
[img] Code is On
[quote][i]Originally posted by C.MontgomeryPunk[/i] If Dos Caras is "Two Face" how can Sin Rostro be "No Face", wouldn't that be Sin Caras? So Caras and Rostro both mean "face"? Either way, I'm not feeling that name at all. I mean this is a MAJOR branding decision for Mistico and that's all he can come up with. Rey Mysterio is "King of Mystery" and now we have "Without a face/Faceless", and "Two Faces"... Either way I don't think it will matter in that I don't think Mistico will last long in the wwe. He thinks that since he was big shit in Mexico and Alberto Del Rio was a midcard act, that he should automatically be ahead of ADR and a top guy. [Edited on 2-24-2011 by C.MontgomeryPunk] [/quote]
Disable smileys?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?
Attachment:
Topic Review
This is a long topic, click
here
to review it.
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
2.24.11 HUGE Announcement Showdown: Jericho vs. Mistico
» Post Reply
Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.2072480 seconds, 20 queries