The Online Onslaught Forums
By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows.
Thanks!
Member List
|
Search
|
FAQ
|
Live Chat
Back to: OOWrestling.com
Last active: Never Not logged in [
Login
-
Register
]
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (September 26, 2011)
» Post Reply
Post Reply
Who Can Post?
All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username
Need to register?
Password:
Forgot password?
Subject:
(optional)
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
White
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Message:
HTML is On
Smilies are On
BB Code
is On
[img] Code is On
[quote][i]Originally posted by S Kid J E T S 48[/i] [quote][i]Originally posted by the goon[/i] Battle royal was pretty standard stuff. No shocker in Cody hanging on to the belt. [/quote] Actually, I thought that was gonna be the cheap way they got the belt off Cody (and possibly to Sheamus to make his match with Christian for a title). It looks like we're getting Rhodes/Orton next either for the belt or not, but that type of feud doesn't need a belt, although I guess it would raise the level of the IC title if Orton doesn't beat Henry on Sunday. Sheamus/Henry for the World Title and Orton/Rhodes for the IC would make a nice top of card for Smackdown. [/quote]
Disable smileys?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?
Attachment:
Topic Review
This is a long topic, click
here
to review it.
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (September 26, 2011)
» Post Reply
Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.2008059 seconds, 20 queries