The Online Onslaught Forums
By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows.
Thanks!
Member List
|
Search
|
FAQ
|
Live Chat
Back to: OOWrestling.com
Last active: Never Not logged in [
Login
]
OO Forums
»
Current: The February Surprise (Sad Edition)
»
Rumor Crap 2016
» Post Reply
Post Reply
Who Can Post?
All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username
Need to register?
Password:
Forgot password?
Subject:
(optional)
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
White
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Message:
HTML is On
Smilies are On
BB Code
is On
[img] Code is On
[quote][i]Originally posted by Count Zero[/i] [quote][i]Originally posted by CM Crunk[/i] Is it beyond the realm of possibility that this is just a meta-work? [Edited on 3/18/2016 by CM Crunk] [/quote]Honestly, I would say it isn't beyond the realm of possibility. In the age of the "WWE Universers" who visit the wwe.com, and the bleacher report, and the other "big media" sites that now deign to cover Pro Wrasslin with the semi-seriousness it deserves... Well, Q: Who is there to "work", and how are you gonna work 'em? A: The people who visit the aforementioned websites, and possibly exactly like this. Then those people tell their friend Mark about the "internet rumors", and suddenly you have a crowd full of people drinking the kool-aid. [/quote]
Disable smileys?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?
Attachment:
Topic Review
This is a long topic, click
here
to review it.
OO Forums
»
Current: The February Surprise (Sad Edition)
»
Rumor Crap 2016
» Post Reply
Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.0421879 seconds, 20 queries