Controversial Ricochet vs. Will Ospreay Match
CCharger - 5-31-2016 at 06:27 PM

Recently a match during the Best of the Super Juniors Tournament in New Japan has garnered a lot of *ahem* attention after some gifs of the match made it stateside.

Some people hated it and their argument boiled down to "It's wrestling, not gymnastics." and "Where's the ring psychology? There's no story being told."

Some people loved it and their argument boiled down to "It's a different style most Americans aren't used to." and "That was pure athleticism on display."

I'm conflicted on the whole thing. I can see both sides. The one major criticism I have is that there were too many moves that should have been finishes that guys kicked out of or no-sold. Nevertheless, I'd be lying if I said I wasn't entertained.

I figured you guys are the best when it comes to HOT TAKEZ on wrestling, so the full match is linked down below.

Have at it, bOOardsters.

http://wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2016/0531/612248/new-japan-pro-wrestling-posts-full-controversial-ricochet-vs/


drmuerto - 5-31-2016 at 07:32 PM

I just watched the match (which is now on YouTube and I also had some mixed feelings about it, although ultimately I was disappointed with the match.

There's no doubt there were a lot of cool acrobatic sequences going on here. I've been a fan of flippy shit ever since the hey day of WCW's cruiser weight division, but it wasn't clear to me why any of this was happening in this match. Perhaps this is a case where the context announcers can provide would have helped. As I was watching I kept trying to figure out what the story here was, and it never clicked for me.

Neither of them seemed very interested in winning the match until about the last 4 minutes. Ricochet was being sort of a heel, but not quite. And it wasn't quite like these were two long-time allies who were trying to one-up each other, since neither one was taunting or otherwise expressing self-satisfaction with getting the best of the other gut in a sequence. It just seemed like they were into laying out roughly equivalent sequences for the sake of showing off the (admittedly) really cool moves and counter-moves they'd come up with.

Two parts stood out in that regard. First, after that (again really cool) set of moves that ended with them striking a superhero pose, it only took a quick kick an da fore-arm shot for Osprey to suddenly be totally at the mercy of Ricochet for a series of corner moves. In fact, all of the transitions were of that sort with not a whole lot of consequences for it. Ricochet worked Ospery's back a bit, but it never impacted what the latter could do in the ring. Second, at the beginning of the go home section Ricochet took two kicks to the head in quick sequence and after a perfunctory kick out at two was back on his feet setting himself up for yet another attack of the ropes from Osprey. It made it seem like the kicks meant nothing, and made the feed into the move seem convoluted.

There was a lot of athleticism on display here, but somehow it felt more like it was in the register of a dance battle than a wrestling match in the context of a tournament that is worth winning. Somehow, it seemed more like a display of athletics than a competition or a fight, and while we all know that wrestling isn't really a fight it's still weird when the fight element gets so lost.


Paddlefoot - 5-31-2016 at 08:58 PM

I can see why the purists are dismissive because that kind of defined the term "flippy shit". Very athletic and well choreographed but that was as far away from how compelling a good Ultimate-X or old-school WCW cruiserweight match could be. It had the flow but it just didn't have any heart to it.


lz4005 - 5-31-2016 at 10:07 PM

That Osprey is a potty mouth.
Check the "pip pip cheerio mother fucker" at 11:35.

The crowd liked it. That was as loud as I've heard a Japanese audience.

You play to the room.

To me the only problem was around the 15 to 18 mark where they no-sold their own damage in a way that pulled me out of the match a bit, but other than that it was very enjoyable to watch. Really dug the finisher.


Count Zero - 5-31-2016 at 11:11 PM

I liked that, a lot. Even though I'm a fan of the flippy-floppy, I can see flaws in the match.. The "restholds", while creative, were more like "look at this pose! Okay, now we release, and do the next one!" even more than some of the counters/reversals. There was no intent to cause 'submission' with most of them -- at least a kick to the head looks like it hurts (until you start no-selling it).


janerd75 - 5-31-2016 at 11:14 PM

Pretty much with everybody else here. One one hand my inner Cornette said, "Motherfuck, this is wrestling, this ain't the Serk de Solay, goddamnit! Next you'll have fukken Joey Ryan pole vaulting into the ring on his dick and pirouette his way into this chop socky clusterfuck...". On the other hand, I could see a lot of cruisers integrating some of those moves into their moveset in betwixt some regular ol' dropkicks and restholds to mellow things out a bit.

Dunno, but Shinsuke vs. Zayn is my recent highwater mark for the flippitydippity-esque stuff that also integrates moves that look like they would actually hurt in the real world.


CamstunPWG187 - 6-1-2016 at 06:12 PM

That match rocked and if it happened in a WWE ring in front of an amazed crowd you guys would be fawning over it.

Fuck whatever "story" you're trying to look for here. That was two awesome flippy dudes doing some of the best flippy shit the business has ever seen, and it ruled.


janerd75 - 6-1-2016 at 08:00 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CamstunPWG187
That match rocked and if it happened in a WWE ring in front of an amazed crowd you guys would be fawning over it.

Fuck whatever "story" you're trying to look for here. That was two awesome flippy dudes doing some of the best flippy shit the business has ever seen, and it ruled.


If the WWE could somehow integrate that style on the "new" Smackdown in a kind of cruiser division like WCW used to have in the glory days of guys like La Parka, Juventud Guerrera, and Psychosis then yeah I could forego that dastardly "story" business. Keep Raw the more "realistic" show and let Smackdown bring on more fantastical guys with weird gimmicks and/or styles.

I think the acceptable cure for the WWE having no real competition for the past 16 years, or ever agayn really, would be for them to finally have Raw and SD be essentially two seemingly distinct entities. Raw gets to be Raw, SD the new WCW, and NXT the new ECW. The more fantastical styles from around the world can filter up through NXT/SD to see how well they work with regular audiences.


BBMN - 6-1-2016 at 08:32 PM

Reminded me of Avatar - great visually speaking, but lacking in heart and depth.

The modified Brock Lock that was busted out of nowhere, and quickly abandoned actually kinda pissed me off.

I give this match 87 out of a 100 Jushin Thunder Ligers.


Columbo - 6-1-2016 at 11:03 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CamstunPWG187
That match rocked and if it happened in a WWE ring in front of an amazed crowd you guys would be fawning over it.



Cams right that match was pretty fucking amazing. He's also right that I would have liked it better with WWE's presentation, imagine that in Chicago, Philly, or NYC on a ppv the atmosphere would have been nuts.

p.s. LOLTNA for not locking down Ospreay when they had the chance.

[Edited on 6-1-2016 by Columbo]


The Hitcher - 6-2-2016 at 03:56 AM

So why's this attracting so much controversy? Just general crusty vets being generally crusty vets? It's a style like anything else and that's about the best "flippy shit" match I've seen in a while.


BBMN - 6-2-2016 at 04:58 AM

I don't think there's really much controversy based upon the likes vs dislikes on YouTube... it's pretty well liked.

I think there's just a small but vocal group of fans that think it was good but not great, for things related to inconsistent selling, which in turn creates a kind of oddly told story...


I mean, at the 14:30 mark, dude hits a modified F-U onto the apron, and what does he get for this devastating move? Reverse Frankensteined on the outside like six seconds later. Calm down already with that shit. Basically it's a wonderfully executed match, but the layout of the match itself is "let's just do like all our moves in a row!"


edit - I mean really now, he takes a high level finishing move from a high level guy in Cena (fuck off, he's beyond over and the F-U has finished fucking everyone), modifies it to an apron spot, and it results in him getting hit with an even more insane move seconds later. If these guys wrote movies instead of matches, they would write Fast & Furious vs Transformers.

[Edited on 6-3-2016 by BBMN]


CamstunPWG187 - 6-2-2016 at 05:53 AM

quote:
Originally posted by The Hitcher
Just general crusty vets being generally crusty vets?


Crusty vets have found out in recent years that they can still stay relevant with the IWC by having crusty vet mentality about highly-praised athletic matches.

I'm glad guys like Regal say fuck all and stand up for these kind of guys and the matches they have. Regal's one of the most scientific mat techs in the game and even he understands the purpose of these types of matches.

Shelton said something I liked, as well: "If everyone wrestled the same style of match, wrestling would die.", or something like that.

No heart? I say the caliber of wrestling they displayed mixed with how crisp and perfect everything looked showed PLENTY of that. I'm glad those two are so good at their craft that they can execute a match like that so flawlessly. THAT shows heart, and dedication, to their craft and love for the business. Ricochet has shown me numerous times that he can tell a "story" in there (his series with El Generico in PWG, for a perfect example), so I don't need to see him do that in every match. I know he's capable of doing it, already.

But why did there need to be a story in that match? Could there have been? Sure, but it's also a round robin-style tournament show, so aren't they just exhibitions? Pro wrestling is so subjective, and people need to understand these matches have their place on the card. The crowd was going apeshit for a Japanese crowd and they even chanted 'This is awesome', which is the first time I have heard that from the Japanese crowd. I say cheers to those two.


Count Zero - 6-2-2016 at 07:15 AM

quote:
Originally posted by BBMN
Fast & Furious vs Transformers.
98 minutes of lens flares and explosions, co-starring The Rock and Shia LaBeouf????

[Edited on 6-2-2016 by Count Zero]


royberto - 6-2-2016 at 12:25 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Count Zero
quote:
Originally posted by BBMN
Fast & Furious vs Transformers.
98 minutes of lens flares and explosions, co-starring The Rock and Shia LaBeouf????

[Edited on 6-2-2016 by Count Zero]
A Michael Bay Film.


royberto - 6-2-2016 at 12:26 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CamstunPWG187
quote:
Originally posted by The Hitcher
Just general crusty vets being generally crusty vets?


Crusty vets have found out in recent years that they can still stay relevant with the IWC by having crusty vet mentality about highly-praised athletic matches.

I'm glad guys like Regal say fuck all and stand up for these kind of guys and the matches they have. Regal's one of the most scientific mat techs in the game and even he understands the purpose of these types of matches.

Shelton said something I liked, as well: "If everyone wrestled the same style of match, wrestling would die.", or something like that.

No heart? I say the caliber of wrestling they displayed mixed with how crisp and perfect everything looked showed PLENTY of that. I'm glad those two are so good at their craft that they can execute a match like that so flawlessly. THAT shows heart, and dedication, to their craft and love for the business. Ricochet has shown me numerous times that he can tell a "story" in there (his series with El Generico in PWG, for a perfect example), so I don't need to see him do that in every match. I know he's capable of doing it, already.

But why did there need to be a story in that match? Could there have been? Sure, but it's also a round robin-style tournament show, so aren't they just exhibitions? Pro wrestling is so subjective, and people need to understand these matches have their place on the card. The crowd was going apeshit for a Japanese crowd and they even chanted 'This is awesome', which is the first time I have heard that from the Japanese crowd. I say cheers to those two.
So, we are not allowed to dislike it because the fans in the audience liked it? Child please.


CamstunPWG187 - 6-2-2016 at 03:29 PM

Congratulations on taking what I wrote, imagining that I meant something other than what I wrote, and then responding to your imagination.


CM Crunk - 6-2-2016 at 09:06 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CamstunPWG187
Congratulations on taking what I wrote, imagining that I meant something other than what I wrote, and then responding to your imagination.


That honestly has to be the worst recipe for a 5-alarm vegan chili that I've ever read, Cam. Hang your head in shame.


Paddlefoot - 6-2-2016 at 09:22 PM

I still say Vader was right, and like BBMN said the non-selling of moves that would result in a pinfall in any other wrestling match was pretty atrocious. A lot of the no-sells were as dumb as Rock doing it with the Stone Cold Stunner or what HBK did during the match with Hogan. Athletic, yes. Talented, yes. Fun, yes. Something I want to see repeated on a regular basis on RAW, SD, or PPV's? No. Like all gymnastics or tumbling exhibitions, which is what that match really was, it's OK every once in a while but I have no need of it more often than that. Japanese fans are cool and all but I see no reason to believe that they're the be-all-end-all authority on what makes a match good than any other fan base in the history of Our Sport has ever been.


CCharger - 6-2-2016 at 10:17 PM

For me, I enjoy suspending disbelief for a bit and pretend wrestling is an actual fight.

When you take a reverse hurricanrana from the apron to the floor and then barely lay there before moving on to your next high spot, it ruins the illusion for me.

It's like having sex with a high end prostitute only for her to take a phone call from her pimp in the middle of her orgasm.

Sell the match like it's a real fight and you are trying to win and/or hurt your opponent. Sell the moves your opponent gives you as realistically as possible. Some of these guys need to go back and watch Magnum TA vs. Tully Blanchard to see how to tell a compelling story, hold the fans in the palm of your hand, AND make it look like they are fucking each other up.

It doesn't have to be either/or.

[Edited on 6-2-2016 by CCharger]


G. Jonah Jameson - 6-2-2016 at 11:40 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CCharger
It's like having sex with a high end prostitute only for her to take a phone call from her pimp in the middle of her orgasm.
[Edited on 6-2-2016 by CCharger]


This is the best comparison to anything ever.


BBMN - 6-3-2016 at 05:43 PM

And I don't want to come off as some super elitist smart fan that only loves a handful of matches. I know there's been some spotfests in the past that I would've said "THIS IS AWESOME" on the first viewing. But as I watch wrestling less and less, I appreciate the craft more and more. A match can be filled to the brim with flippy shit and highspots, but it at least has to make sense. Eating a finisher on the apron and being able to hit an even more brutal move seconds later is something that is reserved for the biggest beasts in the industry. Like Hogan hulking up and no selling anything that hit him. Or Lesnar just being the genetic freakshow. Or Taker being this undead zombie that won't stay down.

But it's not for some dude that is less than 6' and less than 200lbs. Just no.






Now if you will excuse me, I have to renew my subscription to AARP.


CamstunPWG187 - 6-3-2016 at 08:37 PM

Yeah, but at the same time, consider the hardcore indy fans such as myself who have been following guys like Ricochet for nearly a decade in a plethora of promotions, and they aren't just "some guy under 6'0" to us. We have watched guys like him grow from being a sloppy flippy guy with potential to a guy we have seen completely define high-flying.

A small minority, but still.... To those fans in attendance in Japan, Ricochet hasn't just been "some guy" since 2010, and Ospreay has been there long enough to have made them realize that he's on the rise.

Not saying you're wrong, just saying that chances are, if you're watching that match, you probably know who Ricochet is and have heard whispers of Ospreay. Not everyone, but I'd be willing to bet that most people watching night 6 of a Japanese wrestling promotion's tourney has a hunch as to who they are.


The Hitcher - 6-3-2016 at 09:15 PM

quote:
Yeah, but at the same time, consider the hardcore indy fans such as myself who have been following guys like Ricochet for nearly a decade in a plethora of promotions, and they aren't just "some guy under 6'0" to us. We have watched guys like him grow from being a sloppy flippy guy with potential to a guy we have seen completely define high-flying.

A small minority, but still.... To those fans in attendance in Japan, Ricochet hasn't just been "some guy" since 2010, and Ospreay has been there long enough to have made them realize that he's on the rise.

Not saying you're wrong, just saying that chances are, if you're watching that match, you probably know who Ricochet is and have heard whispers of Ospreay. Not everyone, but I'd be willing to bet that most people watching night 6 of a Japanese wrestling promotion's tourney has a hunch as to who they are.


Just as a counterpoint to the above: I had little to no idea who either of them were before I watched that match and still enjoyed it. Probably because it's different to what I'm used to.

I'd say it was "controversial" if this was "the thing" in wrestling at the moment but it isn't so, beyond people calling it "match of the year" which is always highly subjective, it's just different strokes for different folks being blown up because internet.

[Edited on 6-3-2016 by The Hitcher]


lz4005 - 6-3-2016 at 10:02 PM

quote:
Originally posted by The Hitcher
Just as a counterpoint to the above: I had little to no idea who either of them were before I watched that match and still enjoyed it. Probably because it's different to what I'm used to.


I don't know if it helps, but Ricochet is Prince Puma in Lucha Underground.

I still don't get why people are so upset about it. Every match has some combination of technical moves and selling/storytelling. And everyone has a different combination of the two that they prefer.

This one was off the charts on one, at the expense of the other. A slightly different mix might have been "better", but in the grand scheme of things it was just a wrestling match. What difference does it make really?


BBMN - 6-4-2016 at 06:39 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CamstunPWG187
Yeah, but at the same time, consider the hardcore indy fans such as myself who have been following guys like Ricochet for nearly a decade in a plethora of promotions, and they aren't just "some guy under 6'0" to us. We have watched guys like him grow from being a sloppy flippy guy with potential to a guy we have seen completely define high-flying.


My apology for the poor explanation here. I meant "some guy" as "some guy that maybe be an exceptional athlete with tons of fans, but he's still just a man"... Hogan at his peak was the biggest icon in wrestling. A literally hulking mountain of a man with the ability to over come all. His true move wasn't the slam or the leg drop. It was the no sell hulk up. It wasn't his strength that won him the match, it was the heart and soul and toughness of the character... a character that drew this ability from the cheering fans. This is not just some guy. He's practically magical.

Then we have someone like Lesnar. He's not magical. He's simply won the genetic lottery. A true once in a lifetime specimen. He's able to survive finishers because he's 300lbs of raging muscle and hate. He's like Superman if Supes was dumb jock with a mean streak. He transcends the idea of being just some dude. You see this guy on the street and make sure not to look at him the wrong way.

Then we have someone like Undertaker. He's earned the right to no sell. At first it was just his undead gimmick and was more about his look and presence than his strength or status. But over time he solidified himself as one of the greatest legends of all time. Being 7' 300lbs doesn't hurt to in the "I don't have to sell your finisher" dept, coupled with the notion that he's always had this superhuman/undead vibe.

So yea, compared to any of these guys and what they bring to the table, most everyone else is just some guy.

And don't get me wrong. It's fine when two rivals are able to kick out of each others finishers in a huge match. I can get behind that. But this spot wasn't that. It was simply scripted as "you do a big move, then I no sell and do a bigger move"... It's not the same as The Rock kicking out of a Stunner and attempting a Rock Bottom seconds later, or Cena kicking out of an RKO. It's just basically no selling big spots and that's it.

[Edited on 6-4-2016 by BBMN]


SaiyaJinDX - 6-8-2016 at 04:07 PM

I bookmarked the link to eventually get to watch the match but I didn't realize it was only available til June 7th, so I lost my window. Anyone know where I can find that match (preferably streaming than torrent) for free?


BBMN - 6-8-2016 at 10:05 PM

^^^

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4dxp1b_ricochet-vs-will-ospreay-bosj-27-05-2016_sport