The Online Onslaught Forums


By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows. Thanks!

Last active: Never Not logged in [Login - Register]

Printable Version |
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Anyone want to reboot TNA?
Fifth Horseman
Showstopper






Posts 761
Registered 1-14-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 5-15-2011 at 10:47 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Anyone want to reboot TNA?

The WWE thread didn't get much response, so I figured I'd throw this out there. Assume the roster is locked so that you can't add talent, but you can cut it. How would you re-organize TNA - face, heel, etc?





http://www.landingwithjason.com

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DevilSoprano
Pee Wee's Plaything






Posts 5020
Registered 11-16-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 5-15-2011 at 11:03 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Without adding talent, I'm not sure it's worth it. TNA needs to cut a lot and bring in a ton of new names.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member   DevilSoprano 's Aim   DevilSoprano 's Yahoo
Matte
"Family Man"






Posts 4478
Registered 12-16-2008
Member Is Offline

Mood: #HEEL

posted on 5-16-2011 at 12:02 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
For starters, I would send Hogan, Bischoff, and Russo packing. I might keep Flair around for the occasional lunatic promo, but one more fuck up and he's gone, too. Foley can stay around to maybe do some backstage work. He has a good mind.

That right there should already make the shows ten times better.





"I'm a professional. I know exactly what I'm doing." - Jeff Hardy

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Chris Is Good517







Posts 10710
Registered 1-10-2002
Location Little Rock, AR
Member Is Offline

Mood: punchy

posted on 5-16-2011 at 01:18 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
I agree with Dev. It's really going to handcuff people to not allow them to bring in new people because what TNA has to work with right now isn't exactly ideal. But playing by your rules...


quote:
Matte
Foley can stay around to maybe do some backstage work. He has a good mind.



I'd do one better and ditch Tenay on the announce table and replace him with Foley. There's no reason he can't be on the booking team and call the action, too, and I feel like he and Tazz would mesh pretty well together.

Hogan, Bischoff, and Russo would be gone yesterday. I'm pretty sure I'd cut ties with Jarrett and Steiner, too. Sorry, Rob Terry, but you're useless, here's your pink slip. Both of the Hardys are insane liabilites, so they can take a hike, too.

Abyss can stay, but his whole gimmick is being rebuilt from the ground up because he's really boring.

Sting loses the title immediately and will never sniff at it again. From now on, he's used similar to the way WWE uses Undertaker- good for 2 or 3 big money matches a year, and that's it.

The Dudleys get reunited and we pretend Buh Buh's big push never happened. Not that he hasn't been doing a respectable job as a singles heel (and I actually enjoyed his singles run in WWE as a face), but come on.

Any factions larger than 3 members are broken up and we go... I dunno, at least 2 years without any stables. It's really become a crutch for TNA and it isn't working.

The focus of the company, effective immediately, would be AJ and Joe in the sort of roles that Cena and Orton play in WWE, with Mr. Anderson and Hernandez as my top two heels. Angle and RVD are always in the main event mix as well. Then we build Kendrick, both Beer Money guys, both of the Guns, Daniels, Desmond Wolfe, and the Pope as credible threats who can rotate in and out of the ME mix as needed. A level below them would be Matt Morgan, Doug Williams, Jesse Neal, and Crimson, all of whom are guys who I think need more polish to varying degrees. Everyone else can work the midcard or tag team scene.





Gee, I wish I was still alive- LuckyLopez R.I.P.

Bachmann: "I haven't had a gaffe... when it comes to the best Republican who take on Barack Obama and not have any clunker in my record to be able to take him on, it's me."

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member   Chris+Is+Good517 's Aim   Chris+Is+Good517 's Yahoo
Fifth Horseman
Showstopper






Posts 761
Registered 1-14-2006
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 5-16-2011 at 04:05 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
If it stimulates conversation, then by all means, break the "No additions" rule. Have at it.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DevilSoprano
Pee Wee's Plaything






Posts 5020
Registered 11-16-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 5-16-2011 at 04:50 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Before I get to my own stuff, just wanna comment on a few things already posted.

I'm not 100% sure I get rid of Bischoff as an on-screen character. I think he works in that role but if he has to go, I wouldn't be opposed to that. Secondly, I would never put the Dudleys back together again. Get rid of Devon if you have to, but Ray is really shining in this upper midcard heel role. I would never push him harder than that, but use him as a so-called gatekeeper and he's fine. I'd also keep Jarrett in a similar role. Just never mention him and Angle in the same sentence again. Use Sting and RVD in similar roles on the face side. Not in the title picture, but upper midcarders. I'm torn on the Hardys actually. Jeff was working pretty well as a heel but he is a huge liability that you can't trust. Matt on the other hand is another perfectly acceptable midcarder that I'm okay with. Keeping him would truly depend on just how many new people I bring in. At worst, I definitely keep him around for 6 months-1 year and use him as a JTTS to build up the new guys I bring in. He's in shape, he seems motivated and I'd milk that cow for all its worth right now. The first sign of FATT coming back and he'd be gone.

I agree with most of the rest of the names being let go with Steiner, Terry, Hogan, Bischoff, but I'd add quite a few. Robbie E, not the TV champ but the other one of Gunner & Murphy, Anaquia, Dreamer, Red, Okada, Crimson, and I wouldn't even bother repackaging Abyss right now. Get rid of him for a year or 2 and then if you have a good story for him I suppose you can bring him back, but I'd be totally okay with him never stepping foot in the ring again.


With regards to bringing people in, let's start with 1 name and I'll come back with more later. I don't care what he wants and what I have to offer him but I'm giving Paul Heyman total creative control. Let him be the one to pick and choose who comes in while suggesting talents from the indies to him.

Then you have to build from the top down. Decide your main eventers and those in the world title picture for the next year plus. It should be names like Joe, AJ, Dinero, Morgan, Angle, Daniels, Hernandez, and maybe 1 or 2 new names if they're out there.

After that you build down the card and you go back to focusing on the specific divisions. Guns, Beer Money, Gen Me, and then look to the indies for some big tag team names...Briscoes, Kings of Wrestling, Ronin.

Then the women...build around Madison, Mickie, and Sarita. Use Winter, Angelina, Velvet, and Rosita to boost everyone else and then just make it an indy fan's wet dream. Bring back Melissa and Roxxi. Bring in MsChif, Haze, Eagles, Portia. Make it what it used to be.

Then build the X-Division around Kendrick and the indies. Names like Generico, Edwards, Steen, Gargano, Taylor, Ricochet, Delirious and there's a ton more.

And then after that, you should have enough names to handle the midcard/TV title division. Make that belt mean something. It HAS to be defended every week. Nothing major really, just a stepping stone belt to keep midcarders occupied.

Also, with everything they need to do, they'll NEED another hour or 2 of television of week. Because they'll have the roster size for it AND they will not be wrestling 4 minute tv matches only. I want some solid 10-15 minute matches on every show and hopefully more than 1 per show. If you really feel the need to keep Impact as your story/angle advancement show, limit that to 1 10-15 minute match and another 8-10 minute match, but then the other show needs to be founded on WRESTLING. Very little in long story-length promos, more of a combined Wrestling/Reaction type show. Full complete good matches with backstage reactions and follow ups. No 20 minute opening promos. No 20 minute closing segments. No 20 minute middle of the show story advancements. I don't want to say Crash TV, but if you can say the same thing in 5 minutes instead of 20, do it.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member   DevilSoprano 's Aim   DevilSoprano 's Yahoo

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top


Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.2382350 seconds, 21 queries