The Online Onslaught Forums


By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows. Thanks!

Last active: Never Not logged in [Login - Register]

Printable Version |
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Pretty good iron man match between Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose from FCW
Chris Is Good517







Posts 10710
Registered 1-10-2002
Location Little Rock, AR
Member Is Offline

Mood: punchy

posted on 9-22-2011 at 04:20 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Pretty good iron man match between Seth Rollins and Dean Ambrose from FCW

Thanks, YouTube!

This is the first I've seen of Dean Ambrose/Jon Moxley, but he pretty much meets the hype. This was a solid little match and both of these guys could come up to the main roster tomorrow and compete for the secondary titles.

Also, let it be noted that Byron Saxton is already better at calling matches than Michael F. Cole.





Gee, I wish I was still alive- LuckyLopez R.I.P.

Bachmann: "I haven't had a gaffe... when it comes to the best Republican who take on Barack Obama and not have any clunker in my record to be able to take him on, it's me."

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member   Chris+Is+Good517 's Aim   Chris+Is+Good517 's Yahoo
joerizal
Showstopper






Posts 711
Registered 2-7-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: carnivorey

posted on 9-22-2011 at 11:48 AM Edit Post Reply With Quote
What the hell is up with Ambrose's look, though? He looks like a damn jobber, like a more fit Trevor Murdoch.

With a former name like Jon Moxley, I was expecting a leather trenchcoat and all that rocker stuff.





my av is a burger.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
TheDead
Fella






Posts 385
Registered 11-20-2007
Member Is Offline

Mood:

posted on 9-22-2011 at 02:22 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Good match. Slow in some spots, but the ending was well done.

I just don't know what to think of Ambrose. He can clearly wrestle, but he seemed to be going from slapstick to serious too many times.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member   TheDead 's Aim
mastermind
Fella






Posts 345
Registered 3-7-2002
Member Is Offline

Mood: No Mood.

posted on 9-22-2011 at 02:32 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
He's the new age Terry Funk.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
C.MontgomeryPunk
Man of a Thousand Holds






Posts 1700
Registered 1-6-2010
Member Is Offline

Mood: ButtViper-y

posted on 9-22-2011 at 06:05 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TheDead
Good match. Slow in some spots, but the ending was well done.

I just don't know what to think of Ambrose. He can clearly wrestle, but he seemed to be going from slapstick to serious too many times.


I think this is why he needs to be in FCW - he's used to selling for live audiences so he has to over-exaggerate his antics and facials to the folks in the cheap seats can get the story.

That said, I think he's great. His jobber look is also part of his "I don't give a shit" package. He's probably already top five on the mic of all current wwe wrestlers.

He's a cross between Piper and Pillman on the mic and with his persona.





I remember Eddie Guerrero.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
southermagu
Showstopper






Posts 941
Registered 1-11-2006
Location Louisville
Member Is Offline

Mood: The Upper Crust

posted on 9-22-2011 at 06:26 PM Edit Post Reply With Quote
Was that a "New Japan No Sell"?

That was brilliant. First I've ever really seen of either of them, I was impressed. I agree with the sentiment that Ambrose needs to adjust a little bit, but I liked what I saw.





Apparently Amanda Bynes and Charlie Sheen are related, because she's full of the same kind of crazy.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member   southermagu 's Yahoo

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top


Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.2286551 seconds, 21 queries