The Online Onslaught Forums
By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows.
Thanks!
Member List
|
Search
|
FAQ
|
Live Chat
Back to: OOWrestling.com
Last active: Never Not logged in [
Login
-
Register
]
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (October 3, 2011)
» Edit Post
Edit Post
Username
Need to register?
Password:
Forgot password?
Subject:
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
White
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Message:
HTML is On
Smilies areOn
BB Code
is On
[img] Code is On
The company mantra for the last couple of months from both Vince and HHH has been that "No one is bigger than the WWE", so the ending of this week certainly leaves us with some questions: Should HHH step down because he's adversly affecting the WWE and him removing himself from the equation might lead to the return of those that walked out? Should HHH just walk out and say that anyone that walked out last week is now fired. In the interim we get some lesser stars and indy talent getting a chance to shine. Personally I think this whole story should have played out a bit slower as it would have clouded the issues a bit more and given those that walked out a bit more gravitas in terms of their complaints. We're here now, so I guess the question is what do you do with it? I wouldn't be a fan of HHH stepping down as I think it would rob a bit from his win over Punk, which I for one believe was more the middle act of a long term story meant to give Punk some more adversity for when he ultimately triumphs over HHH (at WM or whatever). I also don't think we've really gotten all the mileage out of HHH as the boss as they could as of yet. I think the idea of firing everyone who walked out and then debuting a number of the indy stars the WWE has been sitting on would be just both a cool moment, and a very unique way of introducing some fresh faces. You could then have several lesser heels come slinking back in hopes of winning their jobs back. The rest? I think you could genuinely set up an interesting invasion type scenario with the likes of Miz, Truth, Christian, and Otunga (their missing some muscle though...) working wiht the likes of Nash and Laurenaitis as an NWO type faction... maybe due to some lawsuit they get their own rules and protected status - their secret benefactor; Vince McMahon. If they wanted to carry this a bit further you could even have Vince "buy" air time on Smackdown and attempt to create his own fed. I'm guessing we get something somewhere in between the two with HHH staying on, but conceding a lot of his power, or that several of the heels start getting special rules and protected status for them... Just to put this out there, but that kind of carnage where new guys are getting pushed and the old regime is somewhat handcuffed would definitely fit into a lot of what Punk has said... It doesn't matter then that he lost his title or got screwed, he was the one that tipped the domino or lit the fuse on the powder keg (it also wouldn't matter if Vince got back involved with his own NWO faction or whatever- he's just playing his part in the chaos). This line of thinking would also give us a good reason for Punk to face HHH once more, both with a lot more on the line as Punk tries to close out that last bit of old school Vince's fair haired favourites. So maybe this will tank and suck, but I also see a lot of potential that seemlessly fits with the last several months of TV.
Disable smileys?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (October 3, 2011)
» Edit Post
Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.2900951 seconds, 21 queries