The Online Onslaught Forums
By contributing to Online Onslaught, you'll help make sure we're around for years to come. Toss us as little as a few bucks, or as much as your generosity allows.
Thanks!
Member List
|
Search
|
FAQ
|
Live Chat
Back to: OOWrestling.com
Last active: Never Not logged in [
Login
-
Register
]
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (October 3, 2011)
» Post Reply
Post Reply
Who Can Post?
All users can post new topics and all users can reply.
Username
Need to register?
Password:
Forgot password?
Subject:
(optional)
Icon:
Formatting Mode:
Normal
Advanced
Help
Andale Mono
Arial
Arial Black
Book Antiqua
Century Gothic
Comic Sans MS
Courier New
Georgia
Impact
Tahoma
Times New Roman
Trebuchet MS
Script MT Bold
Stencil
Verdana
Lucida Console
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
White
Black
Red
Yellow
Pink
Green
Orange
Purple
Blue
Beige
Brown
Teal
Navy
Maroon
LimeGreen
Message:
HTML is On
Smilies are On
BB Code
is On
[img] Code is On
[quote][i]Originally posted by cardscott5[/i] [quote][i]Originally posted by C.MontgomeryPunk[/i] And HHH and his lame ass crowd pander "I work for you, the wwe universe" is lame shit. It's desperation pandering. [Edited on 10-4-2011 by C.MontgomeryPunk] [/quote] That's part of the reason why I think the end of the show angle worked. HHH was concerned only about what the fans thought, and not what the people who work for him thought. It showed that HHH didn't really have a leg to stand on in regards to the whole situation, and that in his desperation to please the crowd, he had lost control of the people that he's supposed to be looking out for, the wrestlers. [/quote]
Disable smileys?
Use signature?
Turn BBCode off?
Receive email notification of new replies?
Attachment:
Topic Review
This is a long topic, click
here
to review it.
OO Forums
»
Current: Championship Material
»
OOfficial Ratings/Discussion Thread for: RAW (October 3, 2011)
» Post Reply
Powered by XMB 1.8 Partagium Final SP1
Developed By Aventure Media & The XMB Group
Processed in 0.2000220 seconds, 20 queries