Wrestling News, Analysis and Commentary

 

News  -/-  Recaps  -/-  Columns  -/-  Features  -/-  Reference  -/-  Archives  -/-  Interact  -/-  Site Info

 

Donate to Online Onslaught!
CLICK HERE TO HELP KEEP OO ALIVE!
MAIN PAGE
NEWS
     Daily Onslaught
RECAPS
     RAW
     SmackDown!
     PPV
     NWA-TNA
     Heat
     Velocity
     Other 
COLUMNS
     Obtuse Angle
     RAW Satire
     The Broad
         Perspective

     Inside the Ropes
     OOld Tyme
         Rasslin' Revue
    
Circa/Dungeon 
     Title Wave
    
Crashing the
         Boards

     Deconstruction
     Smarky Awards
     Big in Japan
     Guest Columnists
     2 Out of 3 Falls
     Devil's Due
     The Ring
     The Little Things
     Timeline
    
SK Rants
    
The Mac Files
     Sq'd Circle Jerk
     TWiFW
FEATURES
     RAW vs. SD!:
         Brand Battle
 
     Cheap Heat 
     Year in Review
     Monday Wars
     Road to WM 

     Interviews
REFERENCE
     Title Histories
     Real Names
     PPV Results
     Smart Glossary
     Birthdays 
ARCHIVES 
INTERACT
     Message Boards
     Live Chat 
SITE INFO
     Contact
     OO History

If you attend a live show, or have any other news for us, just send an e-mail to this address!  We'd also love to hear from you if you've got suggestions or complaints about the site...  let us have it!

 
THE OBTUSE ANGLE  
Creating the Half-Fan 
January 16, 2003

by Jeb Tennyson Lund
CitizenScholar.net/OnlineOnslaught.com 

 

Perhaps the finest illustration of the fact that America leads the world in producing obese citizens could be seen at a tractor pull or flea market. But, in a pinch, a WWE show will do. As much as we like to badmouth the birth of hands and corpse violation in WWE programming, perhaps it is the quality of WWE fans and fandom — not the quality of the WWE product — that alienates the average non-fan. Maybe the non-fan is afraid of appearing to be a part of it all.

O, Merciful God — The Sights, The Smells!
I come not to mock those afflicted with glandular disorders, but rather those afflicted with chronic apathy, poor diet — and that righteous over-inflation of a sense of their own attractivess that always seems to directly correspond with over-inflation of their waistbands. Many in the audience around me, at the December 17 Smackdown! taping, did not seem to be drowning in their own fat: indeed, they seemed to be revelling in it.

The woman sitting next to my fiancée, Elaine, looked like the genetic by-product of a pairing of Charles Durning and Gargamel. The giant black mole near her nose — from which sprouted the almost clichéd two hairs growing in opposite directions — momentarily drew my attention away from her girth. It didn't fool Elaine, though: every time Elaine scooted the slightest bit toward me, the woman would exhale loudly, and more of her abundant folds would ooze over the chair-arm into Elaine's seat... like pudding sliding off a plate, onto a table. The woman's great lolloping breasts spread wide and shapelessly across her chest, fully supported by her belly and folded arms. If the arena had been cold, she could have slipped her hands into her giant belly-breast "warmer pouch" — like Bret Favre does at winter games at Lambeau... except without the breasts.

The boy in front of me was worse off by far. The poor child was barely twelve years old, barely five feet tall, and yet he easily weighed 200 pounds. I have always been very self-conscious about being tall and thin; and that awareness of having an uncommon weight made me pity and worry for him so much that I occasionally found myself ignoring the in-ring action. Good God, I thought, how could any mother allow this to happen to her child? Clearly, his parents must have awarded even his enfeebled toddlerish attempts to walk with whole roasted chickens. Worse, the poor kid had dandruff, and any vigorous clapping that he attempted produced a little boy-blizzard of flakes, fluttering from his bowl-cut, onto my loafers. I shook them off, doing a miniature and seated version of Riverdance. What were these people doing to their child?

The final insult — against his parents, certainly not him — came when he turned around to cheer, for Angle, against some booing guys behind me. His chest was larger than the chest of the first girl who ever allowed me to feel her up. (My mind flashed back to awkward Angela B., and her apparent fear that someone toying with her nipple released fatal toxins into her bloodstream.)

The crowning ignominy of my Smackdown! taping experience was the smell. The entire section I was in smelled like feet. Not a normal "feet" smell. I mean the "I would walk 500 miles, and I would walk 500 more — while wearing cheap leather deck shoes and wool socks. In fact, I just did that. Then I took the shoes off" type of feet smell.

I've been to basketball, hockey, baseball, minor-league baseball and football games; I've been to Cirque D'Expensive, Ringling Brothers's Circus and Ice-Capades exhibitions. I've showed up around Vomiting Time at promotional beer-tasting festivals. Never, before, had I experienced such a potent and limitless awful smell. And keep in mind that I went to a hippie, liberal-arts college that only gave students pass/fail evaluations. Some students, so far as I can tell, actually majored in filth.

Smell-O-Nomics
Having seen Survivor Series 2000 in person (in the same arena), I did not expect the undulating sea of bloat and miasma that greeted me at the Smackdown! taping. Maybe the pay-per-view was so captivating for me that I didn't notice the sloth and odiferousness of everyone around me. Maybe most of the fans showered for the "big do." Or maybe the higher pay-per-view prices drew a different crowd.

It was this last possible line of thinking that alerted me to some interesting economic and public-relations issues.
 
• First, I was sitting in a section where each ticket cost $45. Most of the people sitting in this section were with large groups of friends or family, wearing moth-eaten or messy t-shirts, and almost all of their faces were covered with a thin layer of grease. Why, I wondered, would these people spend upward of $250 to take five members of their "kin" to a TV taping when none of them would spend five minutes under hot water?
• Second, most of the people who fit the low-income, low-hygeine, high-fat profile were wearing one (sometimes two or three) WWE t-shirts. In additon to spending a good chunk of their monthly wages to attend the show, they were also willing to fork over $25 per shirt afterward.
• Third, those who generally gave off a middle- to upper-middle-class air were wearing nice clothes without any outward affiliation, except maybe Polo. If one didn't know that there was a wrestling show going on in front of those ticket-holders, one would have been hard pressed to guess what they were watching.

The question to which this all led me was this: does the essential quality of the WWE programming alienate the mainstream middle-class American, or is it the outward "quality" of WWE fans and wrestling fandom?

An Endless (Non-)Defense of A Favorite
By rights, I should never have become a fan of wrestling. I was introduced to it at the age of 22. I started liking it when I was already used to saying "pulchritudinous" when I meant "pretty." I wore loafers all the time and looked like Ichabod Crane in a tweed jacket. In hot weather, I looked like Ichabod Crane vacationing in Key West. I still do. Everything about me fairly screamed (and screams): "wrestling-mocking intellectual snob who has arthritis." Which, of course, I do.

In the next few years, however, my appearance proved to be an indispensable ally in intellectual warfare about the value of wrestling. Not betraying any immediate affiliation with WWF/WCW fandom allowed me to sneakily argue the worth of wrestling as a phenomenon. I could even bust out Baudrillard's comment that it was the only remaining real form of entertainment. Trust me: saying "Baudrillard said so" to a postmodernist jargon-spewer in a black shirt and hemp pants is like saying "Stone Cold said so" to someone in a "What?" shirt.

The important thing I did, though, was go through arguments about wrestling without divulging how much I liked it. If questioned, I would dodge the issue or jumble my answer with unnecessary meaningless qualifications. The funny result of all this was that most people would eventually lean toward me and whisper conspiratorially that they actually kind of liked wrestling. They'd qualify their like for it with all manner of intellectual claptrap, but they would still betray the fact that they were curious.

Eventually, many would agree to come by and watch Smackdown! with me. During my last semester of living in a dorm room, I could count on about four former snobs — or a few genuinely cool open-minded people — coming by to drink some beer and scream at Stephanie McMahon. They loved it, and many of them started using their dorm-room T-3 connections to read CRZ's recaps of Raw — a show we couldn't see, as the dorms could not be wired for cable.

Observation Without Participation
Living in the Sarasota, St. Petersburg and Tampa area offered many opportunities to see WWF house and TV shows. Getting any of my "converts" to go see them with me, however, was impossible. Like the problem with Christianity and hardcore Christians, all of the new converts liked the basic essence of wrestling: they just couldn't stand the fans.

Therein lies the rub. If you ask the average middle-class non-fan if he would feel more at ease standing next to Jeb Lund (remember: tweed, Ichabod Crane) or next to a pipe-fitter wearing an "Austin 3:16" shirt, invariably the answer will be, "Jeb." This is no comment on the quality of me as a person or the "3:16" shirt as a garment; it's simply a comment on most people's comfort within a crowd. Nicely dressed people are less likely to hit strangers or spill beer on them.

The people I "converted" to liking wrestling had no essential problem with sitting on a couch with me and like-hygienic people and watching a free show. There, they were just watching at a distance, somewhat anonymously, in a very small microcosm. Paying $20-$50 to see a show in person, however, would have given those people an implied association with others in the arena. Instead of observing, they would be participating. An informal bond would be created. They would become one of the many... one of the others.

Most middle-class Americans, unfortunately, are snobs, and are far more class-conscious than they assume Britons to be. Unable to be wealthy, they mimic the trappings of wealth by having exclusive tastes and by adopting exclusionary behavior. Rich people don't have to do this, because they are automatically in an exclusive club of their own: only the middle class bend and scrape to be Rotarians or Kiwanis members. In short, a well-off person wouldn't give two shits about sitting next to drunk maniacs screaming at Angle, "You suck!... You Suck!... You Suck!... You Suck!" whereas the charming members of the bourgeoisie would sit, paralyzed with the fear that a neighbor might walk down the aisle and see them.

(In their paranoid minds, of course, the neighbor would not have paid to enter the arena and watch the show. Rather, he would have been let in, by security, to find his problem-child and bring him home to read Paul's Epistle to Philemon and get spanked with rolled-up copies of The Saturday Evening Post. Or maybe suffer "time out.")

The average American does not want to participate in wrestling fandom, because as yet no one has told him that it is okay. (This is the other problem with the average American: disposable income, little self-confidence.) It is still far easier to get a laugh than a look of interest by mentioning pro wrestling. No one wants to be laughed at. Finally, many wrestling fans, by being honestly, grubbily and unapologetically themselves, scare off potential new members. Nicely dressed outsiders have a creeping irrational fear that watching wrestling will result in them forever having vacation-stubble and an urge to wear shirts from Kip's Truck and Tow.

Thus, the "half-fan" is born — living in some quasi-shame, sheepishly laughing at jokes that say all wrestling is fake.

Other Forms of Non-Participation
Any good company markets its products toward its fan-base. The WWE designs its products accordingly. Unfortunately, purchasing a WWE product is another act of participation, as wearing the garment or displaying the poster immediately declares that you are a fan.

If I had hung a Stone Cold poster in my dorm room, it would have clashed violently with the whole tweedy, Ichabod-Crane look that I can't seem to avoid. The contrast would have led to a lot of mockery and unnecessary use of big words. Acknowledging that I was a wrestling fan would have made my life needlessly more difficult. This condition would have been brutally demonstrated had I worn a "You Bring the Ass, We Bring the Whuppin' " shirt to any bar. Being rail-thin and wearing loafers with it would probably have resulted in my ass getting whupped north from Sarasota to Manatee, Pinellas and then Hillsborough counties. In short, it is best for me to not advertise my love of WWE programming.

Similar worries greet the average American half-fan drawn to WWE programming. What will the neighbors think of a t-shirt with a 150-pt. white-on-black printing of the word "ass"? Can a WWE shirt be worn in any place other than the backyard? If I bump into Phil from marketing, while wearing my "Bye Bye Jackass" shirt, will he slip that line in at the next meeting? If I wear my "What?" shirt to the mexican restaurant, will the waiter approach me and say

Would you like something to start?... A snack?... A bite?... Some tapas?... A nibble? I said, 'A nibble'?... A pequeño taste-o?... Maybe an appetizer?... A first course?... Maybe some nachos?... A quesadilla?... A south-west eggroll?... A jalapeño popper?... A fire-bite?... How 'bout some beer? Then another beer? Then some more beer?... Then a margarita? Then another?... Then more beer?... Then a bite?... What?... My name is Ted.... I'm your server. I said, 'Your server'... I'm a waiter.... I get your food.... I bring it to you.... You eat it.... What'll ya eat?... What?
and then say "What?" after every comment I make? Oh, God, is everyone secretly laughing at me?

If the WWE marketing team made shirts that didn't feature huge pictures of wrestlers or 200-pt. sayings, perhaps more middle-America fans would buy them. The brash, crass, vulgar and often offensive quality of WWE shirts makes them a personal liability for those concerned with their appearance. And, for those who don't care so much about what others think, the shirts often fail on the grounds of taste or cleverness.

Solutions to Public Misperception
The WWE shoots itself in the foot in three critical ways, but those problems can be easily corrected.

Problem #1: Little Vinnie Often Uses An Attention-Getting Device
The WWE frequently seeks attention from mainstream media outlets, often with no regard for the type of attention it ends up getting. In Titan Towers, all press is good press, and the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about. Sadly, this reinforces negative stereotypes for the non-fan. Ask a regular Joe, who doesn't watch wrestling, what he thinks wrestling is. These are the three probable responses:
• Hulk Hogan;
• fakery;
• some gay wedding/corpse-raping/bad-acting-type show with that guy who was in The Scorpion King.

There are three easy ways to change this perception: they are named Kurt Angle, Chris Nowinski and Brock Lesnar. Given that the public perception of wrestling is limited to the hot-dog attitude of The Rock and the antiquated grunting of Hogan, what better way to combat that perception than to celebrate those who embody the opposite? Angle, and Angle's Olympic victory, can be hyped far more than they currently are. Give him the publicity machine the WWE still maintains for The Rock: after all, Rock doesn't need it. The public can warm to a physically gifted, generally good-natured all-American boy who did his country proud. The WWE can celebrate both patriotism and dogged accomplishment.

Lesnar and Nowinski are lesser commodities, although I think Nowinski has a unique hook that is more significant than Brock's NCAA championship. It's this: most people in America respect a Harvard grad, because the only Harvard grads most people recognize are on TV or in a newspaper. They are in the media because they've "made it" in some way, not because they went to Harvard. But most people connect the two details, taking an effect (fame) and then creating a cause (Harvard). Harvard shamelessly shills the fame of the talking heads that it produces, hoping that mainstream America buys "it." And most people accept what Harvard tells them because they never get to meet a few Harvard grads... thus never realizing that many are total bozos.

In response, any time any halfway decent talk show wants to book a wrestler, the WWE should send Nowinski. All he has to do is make one incomprehensibly detailed and over-educated comment per show, and a good number of people will start to say: "Hey, wrestlers can make me feel insignificant with their intelligence — just like that Stephen Jay Elliot Gould guy who died while fighting dinosaur viruses."

Sad to say, but many Americans are under the impression that, if popular or "expert" people say something that can't be understood, those popular or "expert" people are of a greater value. Nowinski — and, by extension, all wrestlers — could seem that much more worth listening to or watching due to his Harvard diploma. And of course people may say to themselves: "There might be something to that wrestling, if such a smart young man is willing to spend his life doing it.... Or maybe he's crazy."

Problem #2: Soap Opera Über Advertising
Many non-wrestling fans only see wrestling for the one second it takes to skip past TNN or UPN. When they are exposed to it for longer periods, it is usually during a WWE commercial. But those commercials are generally heavy on sound-bites and excerpts from recent storylines. Essentially, they are aimed at someone who missed last week's show or needs a reminder to see this week's. Anyone who is a stranger to wrestling wonders why someone ran over some lesbian's heart-attack prone dog and immediately gets up to make a sandwich.

A simple solution might be to cut the number of "story" commercials in half, using the other half of ad time for "acrobatics" commercials. The WWE video crew could go through the last twenty years of WWF and WCW/NWA moments, compile maybe one hour of great clips, then break them down into 120 30-second ads. Each ad would feature the "Oh, my God!" or "I think Angle's gonna try the moonsault!" commentary running over the clips. Each could end with a simple black screen, with the words, "WWE Desire" over it.

This sort of approach serves a two-fold purpose. Semi-regular watchers are drawn in by the current storyline in the "story" ads. But semi-regular watchers and non-watchers are reminded/informed of the WWE's dramatic physicality with the "acrobatics" ads. Plus, hardcore fans will have ads they can show to friends and say, "There. That's why I watch this," instead of having to bury their heads when Hot Corpse Action ads run.

Problem #3: Fans Buy Gaudy T-Shirts. Therefore, Everyone Will Buy One.
As stated above, some people don't want to wear a shirt bearing a picture of a wrestler's head that is bigger than their own head. Some people don't like to have the word ASS on their back in 200-pt. type. Those people are not giving the WWE 25 of their own dollars.

I assume — perhaps wrongly — that I am not the only one out there willing to wear a fairly understated WWE t-shirt. I know that "understated" doesn't fit in with the whole "Attitude" concept. But, then again, the WWE is marketing its "Desire" concept, now, and I think tastefulness fits anywhere in that scheme.

WWE shirt designers could take a tip from Mick Foley's autobiography book-jacket. Picture a black shirt, with the small words, "Mick Foley," over the left or right breast. On the back, a simple centered list: "__ broken bones; __ C4 explosions; __ dislocations; 1 lost ear; __ burnings; __ fractures; __ concussions; __ herniated discs; 1 back-flop from 12 feet; __ ruptured discs; __ torn ligaments; __ operations." The blanks would be filled in with the appropriate numbers.

People would approach the wearer of this shirt and say, "Mick Foley? That your name?" The wearer could say no, then turn his back and show them the shirt. "Wow. Who the hell was that guy?" might be a logical question. The answer, "Pro wrestler," would make some people think twice about it being fake.

I know that these proposed solutions are somewhat idealistic. However, they would cost the WWE relatively nothing. They send wrestlers on press junkets all the time. They already throw millions into advertising. They already make a shirt for any wrestler who can fog a mirror. For the most part, the only thing the WWE might lose in their attempts to alter advertising might be pride.

Is There A Lesson?
Throughout this column, I've been unnecessarily harsh in order to make a few points: I've relied and expanded on a few stereotypes. What we tend to forget is that, all rhetoric aside, stereotypes can be very useful in making decisions. For instance, when in an Italian restaurant, surrounded by large Italian men with no visible means of support, making up a daffy song with the word "Mafia" as the only noun is probably a bad call. When you see a lot of Chinese people eating in a Chinese restaurant, the food is probably pretty good. Someone in a white lab coat is probably a doctor or a scientist. The man holding a knife and chanting is not your friend.

Wrestling, though it draws a large number of fans, is still somewhat a niche product. Unlike football, where a fan can look like a derelict or like the President (Nixon was a huge football fan), wrestling carries a stereotyped "fan look" to it. Assuming that someone with a mullet and grease-stained jeans is a wrestling fan is a far safer assumption than that someone in a wool suit tries to watch Raw every week. This stereotype — wrongly, in my opinion — informs the non-fan about the quality and content of WWE products. (It doesn't help that the WWE seeks attention at any cost and is thus rarely presented positively in mainstream media; nor does it help that the WWE markets its product to the stereotype of a "fan.")

The people I saw at the Smackdown! taping I attended made me sad. But that emotion was caused by seeing the health, fitness and hygiene choices they had obviously made: it had nothing to do with what they called entertainment. But I already like wrestling, and maybe that's why I am predisposed to not immediately reject wrestling because of wrestling fans who wear three t-shirts and smell terrible. For many close-minded people out there, though, big waistbands and ring ropes go hand in hand. Polo shirts mean "class," and WWE shirts might as well all be blue-collared. These are the half-fans or the non-fans, and many of them will remain in those categories.

The next time we wrestling fans rush to blame low ratings on Katie Vick or Hot Lesbian Action, we might want to pause and look at the crowd we're in. That crowd has every right to dress, wash and talk the way it wants. But its appearance — not a wrestler with no acting talent — might be the reason the non-fan doesn't buy a ticket or shirt. The WWE's current shortfall in revenue might indeed be based on too much planned success: those who love wrestling love it well, publicly, loudly, undeniably. Those who want to like it are afraid... of being identified, of joining in, of carrying any "self-diminishing" stigma. And a great deal of the time, the shirts and ads they see tell them that they've made the right call.

E-MAIL JEB LUND
BROWSE JEB'S ARCHIVE

Jeb Tennyson Lund is a regular columnist for Citizen Scholar, an online
journal. If you want to read his sadly less wrestling-oriented columns, go
to www.citizenscholar.net.


 
RAW SATIRE: Nunzio, the Female Body Inspector
 
RAW RECAP: R-Truth is One Angry Black Man
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: The Terrorists Win
 
RAW SATIRE: Wrestling's Most Wanted
 
RAW RECAP: T-Minus 48 Weeks, and Counting
 
PPV RECAP: WWE Extreme Rules 2011
 
OOTRR: WWE Unforgiven 2004 Re-Revued
 
RAW SATIRE: WHAMMY'D~!
 
NEWSFLASH: 2011 WWE Draft Results
 
RAW RECAP: Now You See Him, Now You Still See Him
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Edge's Busy Retirement
 
RAW SATIRE: England is Flavor Country
 
RAW RECAP: Changing Plans
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Bittersweet Victory
 
RAW SATIRE: Who is Sin Cara?
 
RAW RECAP: Other Stuff Happened, Too
 
NEWSFLASH: Edge Retires
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Third Time's the Charm
 
RAW SATIRE: Think of the Children!
 
RAW RECAP: Cena and Rock Ask You to Save the Date
 
PPV RECAP: WWE WrestleMania 27
 
ONLINE ONSLAUGHT: A Throwback WrestleMania?
 
PYRO'S PPV CORNER: WrestleMania 27
 
RAW SATIRE: Big Red Tromboner
 
RAW RECAP: Finally...
 
RAW SATIRE: Thrown Under the Bus
 
NXT RECAP: Like a Cow Chewing its Own Cud...
 
RAW RECAP: Sweet Sweet Vengeance
 
RAW SATIRE: Jersey Wisdom?
 
NXT RECAP: The Case for William Regal
 
RAW RECAP: Miz = Winning
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Who Won NXT, Again?
 
RAW SATIRE: G-Rilla is Here!
  
NXT RECAP: Is This Really Necessary?
 
RAW RECAP: The Soul Crushing Finale
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Christian to the Rescue (Again)
 
RAW SATIRE: Miz's Addition by Subtraction Theatre
 
NXT RECAP: Johnny Curtis?!? Really?!?
 
RAW RECAP: Phoning it In
 
SMACKDOWN RECAP: Hasta la Vista, Vickie
 
RAW SATIRE: Scandal in the Tag Ranks
 
NXT RECAP: What the What?!?
 
RAW RECAP: Silence is Golden
 
OO: What I'll Remember About Chris Benoit
 
NEWS CENTRAL: All Updates About Benoit Tragedy

 

 

 


All contents are Copyright 1995-2011 by OOWrestling.com.  All rights reserved.
This website is not affiliated with WWE or any other professional wrestling organization.  Privacy Statement.